KS
Killer-Skills

verification-before-completion — how to use verification-before-completion how to use verification-before-completion, verification-before-completion setup guide, what is verification-before-completion, verification-before-completion alternative, verification-before-completion vs manual verification, verification-before-completion install, implementation of the iron law, gate function in verification, fresh verification evidence

v1.0.0
GitHub

About this Skill

Perfect for Reliability-focused Agents needing rigorous verification and validation protocols Verification-before-completion is a principle that mandates evidence before claims, always, to prevent dishonest completion claims

Features

Enforces the iron law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
Implements the gate function to verify status before expression
Requires running the verification command for accurate completion claims
Prevents violating the spirit of the verification principle
Ensures evidence-based completion claims for reliable results
Supports adherence to the core principle: Evidence before claims, always

# Core Topics

Matt-Aurora-Ventures Matt-Aurora-Ventures
[55]
[5]
Updated: 3/1/2026

Quality Score

Top 5%
44
Excellent
Based on code quality & docs
Installation
SYS Universal Install (Auto-Detect)
Cursor IDE Windsurf IDE VS Code IDE
> npx killer-skills add Matt-Aurora-Ventures/Jarvis/verification-before-completion

Agent Capability Analysis

The verification-before-completion MCP Server by Matt-Aurora-Ventures is an open-source Categories.community integration for Claude and other AI agents, enabling seamless task automation and capability expansion. Optimized for how to use verification-before-completion, verification-before-completion setup guide, what is verification-before-completion.

Ideal Agent Persona

Perfect for Reliability-focused Agents needing rigorous verification and validation protocols

Core Value

Empowers agents to ensure accuracy by enforcing the core principle of evidence before claims, utilizing fresh verification evidence and adhering to the Iron Law of NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE, thereby enhancing reliability and trustworthiness through strict gate functions

Capabilities Granted for verification-before-completion MCP Server

Enforcing strict verification protocols for task completion
Validating claims with fresh evidence
Preventing premature completion claims

! Prerequisites & Limits

  • Requires implementation of the Iron Law
  • Mandatory fresh verification evidence for all claims
  • Strict adherence to the gate function protocol
Project
SKILL.md
3.8 KB
.cursorrules
1.2 KB
package.json
240 B
Ready
UTF-8

# Tags

[No tags]
SKILL.md
Readonly

Verification Before Completion

Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

Core principle: Evidence before claims, always.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Failures

ClaimRequiresNot Sufficient
Tests passTest command output: 0 failuresPrevious run, "should pass"
Linter cleanLinter output: 0 errorsPartial check, extrapolation
Build succeedsBuild command: exit 0Linter passing, logs look good
Bug fixedTest original symptom: passesCode changed, assumed fixed
Regression test worksRed-green cycle verifiedTest passes once
Agent completedVCS diff shows changesAgent reports "success"
Requirements metLine-by-line checklistTests passing

Red Flags - STOP

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • Tired and wanting work over
  • ANY wording implying success without having run verification

Rationalization Prevention

ExcuseReality
"Should work now"RUN the verification
"I'm confident"Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once"No exceptions
"Linter passed"Linter ≠ compiler
"Agent said success"Verify independently
"I'm tired"Exhaustion ≠ excuse
"Partial check is enough"Partial proves nothing
"Different words so rule doesn't apply"Spirit over letter

Key Patterns

Tests:

✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):

✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

Build:

✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)

Requirements:

✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

Agent delegation:

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

Why This Matters

From 24 failure memories:

  • your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
  • Undefined functions shipped - would crash
  • Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
  • Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
  • Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task
  • Delegating to agents

Rule applies to:

  • Exact phrases
  • Paraphrases and synonyms
  • Implications of success
  • ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.

Related Skills

Looking for an alternative to verification-before-completion or building a Categories.community AI Agent? Explore these related open-source MCP Servers.

View All

widget-generator

Logo of f
f

widget-generator is an open-source AI agent skill for creating widget plugins that are injected into prompt feeds on prompts.chat. It supports two rendering modes: standard prompt widgets using default PromptCard styling and custom render widgets built as full React components.

149.6k
0
Design

chat-sdk

Logo of lobehub
lobehub

chat-sdk is a unified TypeScript SDK for building chat bots across multiple platforms, providing a single interface for deploying bot logic.

73.0k
0
Communication

zustand

Logo of lobehub
lobehub

The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We are taking agent harness to the next level — enabling multi-agent collaboration, effortless agent team design, and introducing agents as the unit of work interaction.

72.8k
0
Communication

data-fetching

Logo of lobehub
lobehub

The ultimate space for work and life — to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We are taking agent harness to the next level — enabling multi-agent collaboration, effortless agent team design, and introducing agents as the unit of work interaction.

72.8k
0
Communication